<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Review - Zoundry Raven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/</link>
	<description>Don't be Afraid of the Darc</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ncaditya</title>
		<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>ncaditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Other notable blogging clients include blogdesk and blogjet (not free :( )

However, other than WLW and Raven, no other client can edit wordpress pages. This is a real limitation when you use wordpress as a CMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other notable blogging clients include blogdesk and blogjet (not free <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>However, other than WLW and Raven, no other client can edit wordpress pages. This is a real limitation when you use wordpress as a CMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Terms &#171; DarcNess</title>
		<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Terms &#171; DarcNess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 06:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s a very nifty, pretty full-featured desktop blogging client.&#160; I did a review of it here.&#160; I like it, but nothing is going to take the place of my beloved Windows Live Writer unless I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s a very nifty, pretty full-featured desktop blogging client.&nbsp; I did a review of it here.&nbsp; I like it, but nothing is going to take the place of my beloved Windows Live Writer unless I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarcKnyt</title>
		<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>DarcKnyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Sherri -- I'll be looking for ya today, but have another thingy at 3:00 p.m.  Keep your fingers crossed ... and any other body parts that will without breaking.

Also, what you say about being online is all true, but ... doesn't doing it partially in one tool and finishing in WP's editor sort of defeat the purpose, when you can just do it all in SF?  It &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; upload for you, and I think WP tells you where it goes when it does, right?  Maybe?  I don't know, I've never done it that way.  I think I was using WLW before I joined WP, so I know more about Blogger's editor than WP's.  It just seems like you're making it harder on yourself that way when a single tool will do it for you.

Oh, and I lied about the image handling capabilities of Zoundry Raven.  They're &lt;i&gt;almost&lt;/i&gt; as good as WLW's, but not quite.  I wasn't able to save a screen shot from FireShot to the clipboard and paste it into ZR.  I had to save it to a file and then go get it.  Once it's in, it's just as easy to move around and stuff, but not as easy to get it in there, so sorry about that bit of misinformation.  The rest of it's true, though.

Anyway, whatever works best for you is perfect for you, hon.  Since everyone loves your blog posts, I'd say -- don't worry about how they get there!  ;)

Love ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sherri &#8212; I&#8217;ll be looking for ya today, but have another thingy at 3:00 p.m.  Keep your fingers crossed &#8230; and any other body parts that will without breaking.</p>
<p>Also, what you say about being online is all true, but &#8230; doesn&#8217;t doing it partially in one tool and finishing in WP&#8217;s editor sort of defeat the purpose, when you can just do it all in SF?  It <i>will</i> upload for you, and I think WP tells you where it goes when it does, right?  Maybe?  I don&#8217;t know, I&#8217;ve never done it that way.  I think I was using WLW before I joined WP, so I know more about Blogger&#8217;s editor than WP&#8217;s.  It just seems like you&#8217;re making it harder on yourself that way when a single tool will do it for you.</p>
<p>Oh, and I lied about the image handling capabilities of Zoundry Raven.  They&#8217;re <i>almost</i> as good as WLW&#8217;s, but not quite.  I wasn&#8217;t able to save a screen shot from FireShot to the clipboard and paste it into ZR.  I had to save it to a file and then go get it.  Once it&#8217;s in, it&#8217;s just as easy to move around and stuff, but not as easy to get it in there, so sorry about that bit of misinformation.  The rest of it&#8217;s true, though.</p>
<p>Anyway, whatever works best for you is perfect for you, hon.  Since everyone loves your blog posts, I&#8217;d say &#8212; don&#8217;t worry about how they get there! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Love ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherri Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherri Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>I don't mind having to be online while composing, since I'm always connected, and usually have a browser open. I don't really use SF for the entire post, more as a way to organize the links and ideas while I'm browsing. Then I upload the info as a draft to WP and if I need graphics, I add it into the WP editor since I already know how.

I did use WLW for a couple of posts, but since I'm always online it wasn't worth the memory spent. I'd just find myself going through the WP editor.

You should email me or catch me online and tell me how Friday went! Hugs back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind having to be online while composing, since I&#8217;m always connected, and usually have a browser open. I don&#8217;t really use SF for the entire post, more as a way to organize the links and ideas while I&#8217;m browsing. Then I upload the info as a draft to WP and if I need graphics, I add it into the WP editor since I already know how.</p>
<p>I did use WLW for a couple of posts, but since I&#8217;m always online it wasn&#8217;t worth the memory spent. I&#8217;d just find myself going through the WP editor.</p>
<p>You should email me or catch me online and tell me how Friday went! Hugs back <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarcKnyt</title>
		<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>DarcKnyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>Sherri - ScribeFire's really cool, but you really should give Zoundry a try.  I know you were going to try WLW too, way back when, but if you didn't, Zoundry's a good alternative and maybe a little less intimidating/complicated.  The best advantage Zoundry and WLW -- or any desktop client for that matter -- has over ScribeFire is that you don't need to work online.  I don't know if SF will allow you to compose if you're not online, but with Zoundry and WLW you can write your post and save it as a draft for posting later.  You can also save more than one draft, so you can have a series of things in the draft status and post them all later.

One advantage I noticed in working with things like Zoundry and WLW is the image-handling capabilities are far superior to SF.  You can place the image, size it easily, tell it whether you want the image on the left, right or centered, whether to wrap text around it or to have it be inline (no wrapping), etc.  That may be more than you need or want, but for folks that do a lot of image inserting, it's really important (and the coolness factor's high too).  Also, both Zoundry and WLW will automatically upload your images for you; there's not a separate step for that like with SF.

But I'm glad you like SF, and it's cross-platform capabilities make it a great tool.  WLW has added an extension for on-the-fly blogging, so V has gotten away from SF altogether (she actually uninstalled it, and so did I).  I think, ultimately, it's what your all comfy and cozy with: if you like SF, use it.  Whatever helps make you a more efficient and happier blogger is the best tool for you.  :)

Thanks for coming by, sweetie.  I really appreciate the comments, and hope you're doing all right.  :)  *hugs and love*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sherri - ScribeFire&#8217;s really cool, but you really should give Zoundry a try.  I know you were going to try WLW too, way back when, but if you didn&#8217;t, Zoundry&#8217;s a good alternative and maybe a little less intimidating/complicated.  The best advantage Zoundry and WLW &#8212; or any desktop client for that matter &#8212; has over ScribeFire is that you don&#8217;t need to work online.  I don&#8217;t know if SF will allow you to compose if you&#8217;re not online, but with Zoundry and WLW you can write your post and save it as a draft for posting later.  You can also save more than one draft, so you can have a series of things in the draft status and post them all later.</p>
<p>One advantage I noticed in working with things like Zoundry and WLW is the image-handling capabilities are far superior to SF.  You can place the image, size it easily, tell it whether you want the image on the left, right or centered, whether to wrap text around it or to have it be inline (no wrapping), etc.  That may be more than you need or want, but for folks that do a lot of image inserting, it&#8217;s really important (and the coolness factor&#8217;s high too).  Also, both Zoundry and WLW will automatically upload your images for you; there&#8217;s not a separate step for that like with SF.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m glad you like SF, and it&#8217;s cross-platform capabilities make it a great tool.  WLW has added an extension for on-the-fly blogging, so V has gotten away from SF altogether (she actually uninstalled it, and so did I).  I think, ultimately, it&#8217;s what your all comfy and cozy with: if you like SF, use it.  Whatever helps make you a more efficient and happier blogger is the best tool for you. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for coming by, sweetie.  I really appreciate the comments, and hope you&#8217;re doing all right. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  *hugs and love*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherri Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherri Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darcknyt.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/software-review-zoundry-raven/#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>I don't know why, but my last two comments didn't show up! Darn you, WP!!! 

I'm still liking the Scribe Fire, but it couldn't hurt to give zoundry  a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why, but my last two comments didn&#8217;t show up! Darn you, WP!!! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still liking the Scribe Fire, but it couldn&#8217;t hurt to give zoundry  a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
